Coats faced “a choice” after Trump issued a stunning rebuke of the US intelligence community, saying he doesn’t “see any reason why” Russia would be responsible for interfering in the 2016 election — touting Putin’s vigorous denial then pivoting to complaints about the Democratic National Committee’s server and missing emails from Hillary Clinton’s personal account.
Rather than staying quiet, Coats opted to issue a strongly worded statement backing the intelligence assessment that Russia did, in fact, interfere in the election. He also reaffirmed his commitment to “provide unvarnished and objective intelligence in support of our national security.”
A senior intelligence official told CNN that it was Coats’ decision to release the statement following internal discussions Monday morning and that it was not cleared with the White House beforehand.
“The role of the Intelligence Community is to provide the best information and fact-based assessments possible for the President and policymakers. We have been clear in our assessments of Russian meddling in the 2016 election and their ongoing, pervasive efforts to undermine our democracy, and we will continue to provide unvarnished and objective intelligence in support of our national security,” the statement said.
Amid a flood of criticism back home, Trump later tweeted from Air Force One that he has “GREAT confidence in MY intelligence people” but that message has done little to reassure those who feel he undermined the US in front of its greatest geopolitical adversary and are concerned by the President’s willingness to believe Putin over his own intelligence apparatus.
Trump’s comments on Monday are fueling questions about whether Coats should continue to serve in his current role as DNI.
Asked if anyone from the administration will resign over the President’s remarks, a senior White House official quipped, “Good question.”
Larry Pfeiffer, a former CIA official who also ran the Situation Room, tweeted that Coats should “resign in protest and disgust.”
“I think Dan Coats, being head of the intelligence community, is probably the right guy to resign at this time,” Pfeiffer told CNN, adding that history has show that when a person with integrity takes this kind of step, it can move conversations forward at perhaps a different level.
“To those saying we need the DNI to stay, I would respond with the question: Has his presence curbed the President? History shows well-timed and principled resignations help illuminate and focus on problems. As would a confirmation hearing for a successor,” Pfeiffer added in a second tweet.
Former CIA Director Michael Hayden said he believes Coats has been honest and firm in his assessments but that at some point officials begin to wonder whether they are still acting as a guardrail or if by staying in government they have become an “enabler and legitimizer.”
“At some point, good people have to decide,” he told CNN.
Pfeiffer was also asked if Coats could still competently do his job given that the President remains steadfast in his own conclusions about Russia’s election interference despite repeated warnings from his top intelligence official.
“I don’t know how he can continue,” Pfeiffer said, noting that Trump’s comments came just days after Coats issued a warning about Russia’s cyber threat.
Coats said last week that the US faces a “critical” threat of potentially devastating cyberattacks from several state actors — with Russia being the “worst offender.”
But Trump raised doubts about Coats’ conclusion in an interview with CBS News recorded prior to his meeting with Putin and released on Monday.
“I don’t know if I agree with that. I’d have to look,” Trump said when asked about Coats’ warning.
The President added that he has “a lot of respect” for Coats, but with his breaking with his top intelligence official on major issues related to Russian national security threats, Coats’ future seems uncertain.